tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923333.post8291003648823635251..comments2024-02-16T11:57:27.930+01:00Comments on Serge Thorn's IT Blog: Keep an eye on OneCMDB and the CMDB FederationSerge Thornhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07698523659465830145noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923333.post-74288767104511064052010-01-27T12:20:29.681+01:002010-01-27T12:20:29.681+01:00It was extremely interesting for me to read that b...It was extremely interesting for me to read that blog. Thanx for it. I like such topics and anything that is connected to this matter. I definitely want to read a bit more soon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923333.post-60680440050312051502009-12-12T08:33:12.532+01:002009-12-12T08:33:12.532+01:00当サイトでは無料でオナ動画を見ることができます。また、ライブチャット機能でリアルタイムオ○ニーを見る...当サイトでは無料でオナ動画を見ることができます。また、ライブチャット機能でリアルタイムオ○ニーを見るチャンスも高く、興奮間違いなしです。また、一人Hのお手伝いを希望される女性もあり、お手伝いいただけた方には謝礼をお支払いしておりますライブチャットhttp://www.yinming.org/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923333.post-44951701544528966292009-04-23T02:25:00.000+02:002009-04-23T02:25:00.000+02:00Hi Serge:
I agree on the interesting developmen...Hi Serge: <br /><br />I agree on the interesting development of OneCMDB. Although it is still rudimentary and the V2 is still operational constrained, it is a technology that can have many uses. <br /><br />For example, even though the default OneCMDB Configuration Item (CI) datamodel (i.e., metamodel) is designed for ITIL (i.e., IT asset definition and context of asset as its "configuration"), all as the "Configuration Item", there is nothing that inhibits development of another metamodel/datamodel for something outside the ITIL domain, or from extending the CI datamodel. <br /><br />For me I am considering using OneCMDB for small scale enterprise architectures and terminologies, where what ITIL calls an asset is just a class or type with attributes, what they call a reference is another name for a "relationship", and what they call a configuration item is just another name for an "ontology" or "architecture".<br /><br />I'm still experimenting.<br /><br />What are your thoughts on this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923333.post-37457431006235865592009-04-23T00:40:00.000+02:002009-04-23T00:40:00.000+02:00To comply with CMDBf all One CMDB has to do is pro...To comply with CMDBf all One CMDB has to do is provide a query API as defined by CMDBf, because that's all CMDBf defines. http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdbf-umexplained<br /><br />i believe CMDBf is still lost in the depths of DMTF, unratified and unmournedThe IT Skeptichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065984082713072110noreply@blogger.com